64
64
Dec 7, 2012
12/12
by
WBAL
tv
eye 64
favorite 0
quote 0
>> the tax code says sell apple. if you own it in a taxable account, i feel you've been given a fantastic opportunity to pay a lower tax rate on your profits than you will in a few weeks time. given that i think many people own apple in their taxable or "mad money" accounts, it might be uniquely in the cross hairs of the fiscal cliff. you combine the greatest capital gains generator out there of all time with a change of tax code of uncertain proportions, it's almost impossible to justify not selling. those people then impact the chart and the chartists signal code red which causes the institutions to worry that, perhaps, the stock can bring down the performance, which brings in still more selling. >> sell, sell, sell! >> it's a vicious cycle down. it makes a ton of sense. let's talk about what can happen here. year end, 2013, it will be too late to sell to get the tax break. we'll find out, i believe, that apple's ipad sales are through the roof, including the mini, the iphone will have bigger sales than we thought
>> the tax code says sell apple. if you own it in a taxable account, i feel you've been given a fantastic opportunity to pay a lower tax rate on your profits than you will in a few weeks time. given that i think many people own apple in their taxable or "mad money" accounts, it might be uniquely in the cross hairs of the fiscal cliff. you combine the greatest capital gains generator out there of all time with a change of tax code of uncertain proportions, it's almost impossible...
99
99
Dec 15, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 99
favorite 0
quote 0
now virnetx is going after apple in federal court. on february 6th a federal jury ruled in favor of virnetx and ordered apple to pay them 368 million smackers for past patent infringement. next week we're going to get verdict from a judge that could increase or decrease the damage and also details on the payment for apple. this post-trial judgment's important because virnetx has litigation's in works against apple. it filed a new lawsuit against apple for willful patent infringement on a public of products including the iphone 5. the itouch. the last ipad, the ipad mini. ordinarily it's very difficult to bet on litigation. it's like betting on, some people would say, not me, betting on a coin toss. but given they just won a case against apple based on these same patents i think it's more likely they will once again prevail. and winning could mean virnetx gets not just a lump sum but a royalty in these super apple products and that would be a potential windfall. that's not the only thing virnetx has going for it either. in march it's s
now virnetx is going after apple in federal court. on february 6th a federal jury ruled in favor of virnetx and ordered apple to pay them 368 million smackers for past patent infringement. next week we're going to get verdict from a judge that could increase or decrease the damage and also details on the payment for apple. this post-trial judgment's important because virnetx has litigation's in works against apple. it filed a new lawsuit against apple for willful patent infringement on a public...
110
110
Dec 18, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 110
favorite 0
quote 0
finally there's apple. we've become addicted to apple. we are deeply focused on its decline which continued in the a.m. today, taking out $500 right before the opening, while it rallied with the rest of the market into the bell. i'm sure some people feel it's now washed out. i for one welcome the shakeout. apple had gotten too hot. apple had become the only stock that people talked about, a sure sign it was overheated. the summer soldiers, the sunshine patriots, they're now headed for the hills. aided by analysts who can't take the pain and are anxious to distance themselves from a stock that they perceive to be a loser so they cut the price targets and their numbers. i don't know if their numbers are right. as painful as it might be, it's a cathartic move. one that should end in the tax year is over. no one stock should be able to reign over the others that are publicly traded. apple's reign is now ending, and that's good news, not bad. including only good news for apple as a sustainable run does not ever include a parabolic move. here's
finally there's apple. we've become addicted to apple. we are deeply focused on its decline which continued in the a.m. today, taking out $500 right before the opening, while it rallied with the rest of the market into the bell. i'm sure some people feel it's now washed out. i for one welcome the shakeout. apple had gotten too hot. apple had become the only stock that people talked about, a sure sign it was overheated. the summer soldiers, the sunshine patriots, they're now headed for the...
56
56
Dec 6, 2012
12/12
by
WBAL
tv
eye 56
favorite 0
quote 0
apple. if we're going off the fiscal cliff, we know capital gains tax rates are going higher, right? right? that's obvious. do you really think the republicans have the power to keep those capital gains rates down? apple's become a referendum on the president's power and polling. right now he has the upper hand, then he can really roll them and intends to do so. it's reasonable to take some profits so you can pay the tax man less now rather than more later. it's a wimpy thing, it's logical, makes perfect economic sense. especially if you hold apple. so the stock gets hammered. it makes sense to sell it. but let's be less emotional and even clinical about this one. first, divide apple's share price by ten, now you have a stock that got crushed down to $54. when you do that arithmetic, it isn't all that scary, is it? where does the pessimism fit in? when we have to endure the pin the tail on the selloff game, what excuses for the selloff, myriad alibis i hear from today's action. apple's losin
apple. if we're going off the fiscal cliff, we know capital gains tax rates are going higher, right? right? that's obvious. do you really think the republicans have the power to keep those capital gains rates down? apple's become a referendum on the president's power and polling. right now he has the upper hand, then he can really roll them and intends to do so. it's reasonable to take some profits so you can pay the tax man less now rather than more later. it's a wimpy thing, it's logical,...
180
180
Dec 10, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 180
favorite 0
quote 0
that brings me to apple. i think apple is going down pretty much every day for the simple reason that there are more severals than buyers, but the vast majority of people who own the stock will be capital gains and they'll be taxing the ira anyway. so does it matter how apple's quarter is? whichive it happens to be the last day of the year, logic is stunningly simple. then it should let up when they can't get the tax break anymore. if i told you that sales taxes are going up, maybe big, i won't say large screen tvs come 2013. wouldn't you go buy one now rather than 2013. if the president were to say that taxes aren't going up, there's no taxes on apple if you sell it, i think the selling would be done immediately n short washington is driving this, not apple, it's an inexpensive stock. here's the bottom line, i would do anything not to focus on washington, anything. but we can't go much higher without a deal, any deal. and a deal is going to be made or not made on wall street, now washington. and i have to go
that brings me to apple. i think apple is going down pretty much every day for the simple reason that there are more severals than buyers, but the vast majority of people who own the stock will be capital gains and they'll be taxing the ira anyway. so does it matter how apple's quarter is? whichive it happens to be the last day of the year, logic is stunningly simple. then it should let up when they can't get the tax break anymore. if i told you that sales taxes are going up, maybe big, i won't...
133
133
Dec 12, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 133
favorite 0
quote 0
apple rallied eleven and change. i hope this mini rally is happening because people have looked over the fiscal cliff and they weren't terrified by what they saw. i hope we will get by. i hope they don't mind government intervention in their portfolios. because they are not going away. i hope that because what i heard in washington today were two sides even though i can tell them that a deal would be done and there would be no vacation without legislation, we'd be in much better shape. i have to tell you, as encouraging as the market was this morning, the situation in washington is as discouraging. one after another i started with a new tack. i said let's go there. i said i totally agree the issue of spending not revenues. tell us what you have done to get spending done. did they give this fellow traveler some ideas? no. they attacked the president. each time when i asked for ideas on what to cut, like right now, lower drug prices or pulling back our army from japan and europe. like every other country in the north d
apple rallied eleven and change. i hope this mini rally is happening because people have looked over the fiscal cliff and they weren't terrified by what they saw. i hope we will get by. i hope they don't mind government intervention in their portfolios. because they are not going away. i hope that because what i heard in washington today were two sides even though i can tell them that a deal would be done and there would be no vacation without legislation, we'd be in much better shape. i have...
165
165
Dec 1, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 165
favorite 0
quote 0
or apple they bet don't do one. i don't need them to pay a special dividend to tell you to own apple. we don't trade up. just own it. it just owns it. the only news monday will be ford and gm sales. they could be huge. not in a way that will make a lot of sense. the first half of the month sales were weak as consumers in the northeast weren't doing much car shopping. the second half had to be on fire. sandy may have been the single biggest car destroyer since katrina, or maybe more given the fact that so many imported cars were damaged near the docks of the region's rivers. tuesday morning we hear from the brothers toll. here's the best home builder in the country it will tell you the story of the boom. if you remember there was a time when bob toll of toll brothers and eagles fan came on "mad money" during what turned out to be the early part of the housing collapse. he said he saw the light at the end of the tunnel. >> all aboard! >> but it was most likely the light of an oncoming train. those days are gladly behi
or apple they bet don't do one. i don't need them to pay a special dividend to tell you to own apple. we don't trade up. just own it. it just owns it. the only news monday will be ford and gm sales. they could be huge. not in a way that will make a lot of sense. the first half of the month sales were weak as consumers in the northeast weren't doing much car shopping. the second half had to be on fire. sandy may have been the single biggest car destroyer since katrina, or maybe more given the...
81
81
Dec 19, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 81
favorite 0
quote 0
apple should be viewed in a larger context. now the stock that you are recommending that is in free fall before your very eyes and how you can't take it anymore. it is up 22 points low where the stock went out today. on november 25th, citi group rolled out its apple coverage with a buy. $571, the stock will give you a 20% return. that is what they said. apple had a 28% correction, come all the way down from down there. it was still below the other price targets. in the end they said it was at a near term trough and seemed like a very good trade to them. the supply constraints may not be an issue after all. more than just a trade. citi downgraded the stock, which caused the stock to trade briefly below $500 before the market opened. as articulated in our recent initiation, it was trading oriented. a near term rally. reflecting the expectations for a near term rally. however, near term supply chain bring into question the strength of the iphone 5. as such, we see the likelihood of a near term rally as diminished and downgrade the
apple should be viewed in a larger context. now the stock that you are recommending that is in free fall before your very eyes and how you can't take it anymore. it is up 22 points low where the stock went out today. on november 25th, citi group rolled out its apple coverage with a buy. $571, the stock will give you a 20% return. that is what they said. apple had a 28% correction, come all the way down from down there. it was still below the other price targets. in the end they said it was at a...
240
240
Dec 11, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 240
favorite 0
quote 0
if i want to own an apple play, i'm going to stick with apple. let's go to mark in wisconsin. >> jim, thank you for taking my call. your thoughts on parker drilling. >> no no no no no we don't need parker drilling. let it come up and ka ching. i like to go with slob. how about jeff in illinois? >> happy holidays jim. thank you for taking my call. i have been wlhistling to the g agriculture sector. >> those are both good companies. right now i prefer montana a little bit. but those are biotech companies that are seed companies. i'm not done. i'm going to phillip in arizona. >> hi jim, what do you think of alcoa at this point? >> it is a both stock trapped in the commodity. it is going to have to wait. let's go to patricia in hawaii. >> yes, i'm here. yelp, i bought it at $21. >> hold on to it. i think it is worth more. don't sell yet. >> let's go to stewart in new york. >> how you doing. i love you like the giants and i have a winner for you for next year. >> well, um okay. it is okay. frankly, i prefer others to it. um, for instance, i would even
if i want to own an apple play, i'm going to stick with apple. let's go to mark in wisconsin. >> jim, thank you for taking my call. your thoughts on parker drilling. >> no no no no no we don't need parker drilling. let it come up and ka ching. i like to go with slob. how about jeff in illinois? >> happy holidays jim. thank you for taking my call. i have been wlhistling to the g agriculture sector. >> those are both good companies. right now i prefer montana a little bit....
225
225
Dec 7, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 225
favorite 0
quote 2
apple down another 14, up 50. people worry about apple because is it doesn't have an omg factor. that's the word. when you show this around, do not people just -- jaws drop, right? >> well, it's amazing. especially our customers are our best advertisers, right? they're the people who are posting hundreds of youtube videos. but it's the psalm thing in emerging markets. so we go to do a demonstration in india, and really cooking is traditionally a woman's task in those communities and we have the men pushing to the front and center of the circle because they want to charge their cell phones. so it creates this really great dynamic where at one time it's a health intervention that's hopefully going to save a couple million lives every year, but the draw is for the same commercial reasons that we would want to have them here. >> now, i would want one of these in my trunk, right? >> right. >> little plastic bag. if i ever got in a jam at the side of the road, i'd stay warm and charge my phone. >> and not only that, it's on-demand energy. we think of it as energy everywhere. >> on dema
apple down another 14, up 50. people worry about apple because is it doesn't have an omg factor. that's the word. when you show this around, do not people just -- jaws drop, right? >> well, it's amazing. especially our customers are our best advertisers, right? they're the people who are posting hundreds of youtube videos. but it's the psalm thing in emerging markets. so we go to do a demonstration in india, and really cooking is traditionally a woman's task in those communities and we...
118
118
Dec 21, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 118
favorite 0
quote 0
maybe he should say you better dump your apple now. suffice it to say we all have to keep one eye on washington and hope they don't poke it out with their endless failure to rise above partisanship. when we started this campaign, i'm sure a lot of people said don't worry, they'll do it. today was like the worst day yet. the two parties hate each other. they really do. they personally hate each other. but how about the other eye, the one that's not focused on the fact that all of our paychecks are about to be reduced and we're likely going to have big layoffs? what is that eye supposed to be focused on? and is it even possible to focus on anything but the chaos that will ensue. i'm calling for the super bowl resolution. the people rise up by february and we get a compromise. we got the answer to what we should be focused on in spades today. we needed to focus on the desire of corporate america to stop the paralysis, and get busy growing their businesses, not just new sales and better products but through acquisitions. >> buy, buy, buy!
maybe he should say you better dump your apple now. suffice it to say we all have to keep one eye on washington and hope they don't poke it out with their endless failure to rise above partisanship. when we started this campaign, i'm sure a lot of people said don't worry, they'll do it. today was like the worst day yet. the two parties hate each other. they really do. they personally hate each other. but how about the other eye, the one that's not focused on the fact that all of our paychecks...
170
170
Dec 3, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 170
favorite 0
quote 0
>> caller: ski daddy, my stock is apple. >> i think you're fine with apple. i think there's a fantastic piece in the "washington post" yesterday, i urge you to get it and the business sector. talks about the five myths of apple and why the stock could go higher and i agree. let's go to ellis in new york, ellis? >> caller: wondering if your thoughts on pharma, atrs. >> this thing has doubled its a needle stock. we have not had good luck recommending needle stocks, i'm not going to go for it joey in colorado, joey? >> caller: hello. booyah jim cramer. how about wynn energy, buy, sell or hold? >> linn energy is tresk. if you want to do it, it's terrific. i like the linn -- let's go to jude in my home state of new jersey. >> caller: how are you? >> okay. >> caller: what do you think of american eagle outfitters? >> take the money and run. you got a good one and now you can go. that's a hard business, really hard apparel business. i need to go to mary in new york. >> caller: i'm wondering about knight capital. >> limited upside. i think that tommy joyce, the c ceo
>> caller: ski daddy, my stock is apple. >> i think you're fine with apple. i think there's a fantastic piece in the "washington post" yesterday, i urge you to get it and the business sector. talks about the five myths of apple and why the stock could go higher and i agree. let's go to ellis in new york, ellis? >> caller: wondering if your thoughts on pharma, atrs. >> this thing has doubled its a needle stock. we have not had good luck recommending needle...
140
140
Dec 20, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 140
favorite 0
quote 0
we may have worries about apple. we may be concerned about personal computers, but overall tech spending with big data and storage, it's hard to be better than this. welcome to the future. at last, it's like the past. stay with cramer.
we may have worries about apple. we may be concerned about personal computers, but overall tech spending with big data and storage, it's hard to be better than this. welcome to the future. at last, it's like the past. stay with cramer.
83
83
Dec 28, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 83
favorite 0
quote 0
think about apple or whole foods or amazon. some of the major biotech companies, amgen, gilead, celgene, growing like the big companies of old, back when big pharma was synonymous with growth and not high dividend. when we buy a stock we're paying for a company's expected future earnings per share. i'll repeat that, really important. expected future earnings, not past. a lot of people call me with the past and say that looks cheap, future earnings. it's the basic valuation algebra, share price, p, price, equals the earnings per share, e, times what's known as the multiple, m. price-to-earnings multiple. e times m equals p, tells you what investors are willing to fork over for a company's future earnings. this blew me away when i got to goldman sachs. we're solving for "m" and the most important determining and vital ingredient that has the greatest effect on the size of the valuation, the company's growth rate, that's why we pay so much attention. the growth rate is what matters more than anything else in cramerica after the ba
think about apple or whole foods or amazon. some of the major biotech companies, amgen, gilead, celgene, growing like the big companies of old, back when big pharma was synonymous with growth and not high dividend. when we buy a stock we're paying for a company's expected future earnings per share. i'll repeat that, really important. expected future earnings, not past. a lot of people call me with the past and say that looks cheap, future earnings. it's the basic valuation algebra, share price,...
187
187
Dec 19, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 187
favorite 0
quote 0
we may have worries about apple. we may be concerned about personal computers, but overall tech spending, it's hard to be better than this. welcome to the future. at last, it's like the past. stay with cramer. bob, these projections... they're... optimistic. productivity up, costs down, time to market reduced... those are good things. upstairs, they will see fantasy. not fantasy... logistics. ups came in, analyzed our supply chain, inventory systems... ups? ups. not fantasy? who would have thought? i did. we did, bob. we did. got it.
we may have worries about apple. we may be concerned about personal computers, but overall tech spending, it's hard to be better than this. welcome to the future. at last, it's like the past. stay with cramer. bob, these projections... they're... optimistic. productivity up, costs down, time to market reduced... those are good things. upstairs, they will see fantasy. not fantasy... logistics. ups came in, analyzed our supply chain, inventory systems... ups? ups. not fantasy? who would have...
238
238
Dec 26, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 238
favorite 0
quote 0
maybe you bought apple when it was trading around 200. it represented 15% of your portfolio. it's now a much larger piece of the pie. at that point you have too much exposure to even the single best stock and to whatever sector that stong is in. keeping all your eggs in one basket is down right dopey. that's why you need to trim your winners as they go higher, so they don't become too large a piece of your portfolio and get you in trouble. i'm not saying sell them all. if you're investing for the long term, you got time to do this and you do it gradually, pieces be, not all at once. as your winners go higher, you should sell off parts of your position. never sell all at once, just as you should never buy all at once and wait for moments of strength. you don't want your portfolio to become too heavily waited toward any one group. when you sell your best per forrers, it's the idea of playing with the house's money. when you own a stock that's had a huge multi-year run, you want to trim your position and all the money you have invested comes from profits you already made and not
maybe you bought apple when it was trading around 200. it represented 15% of your portfolio. it's now a much larger piece of the pie. at that point you have too much exposure to even the single best stock and to whatever sector that stong is in. keeping all your eggs in one basket is down right dopey. that's why you need to trim your winners as they go higher, so they don't become too large a piece of your portfolio and get you in trouble. i'm not saying sell them all. if you're investing for...
170
170
Dec 20, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 170
favorite 0
quote 0
first wall street's been taking a bite out of apple but this tech manufacturer lit up the ticket today. is it charged for a reason in 2013? then, as hiring picks up in the u.s., could paychecks help you cash in? and with the housing market in full recovery, is it time to furnish your financials with eth ethan allen. there are the interviews you can't afford to miss, all coming up on "mad money." >>> don't miss a minute of "mad money." follow jim on twitter. send jim an e-mail or give us a call at 1-800-743-cnbc. miss something? head to madmoney.cnbc.com. i always wait until the last minute. can i still ship a gift in time for christmas? yeah, sure you can. great. where's your gift? uh... whew. [ male announcer ] break from the holiday stress. ship fedex express by december 22nd for christmas delivery. you can stay in and like something... or you can get out there and actually like something. the lexus december to remember sales event is on. this is the pursuit of perfection. >>> our leaders in washington are constantly paying lip service to the importance of small business. as a postur
first wall street's been taking a bite out of apple but this tech manufacturer lit up the ticket today. is it charged for a reason in 2013? then, as hiring picks up in the u.s., could paychecks help you cash in? and with the housing market in full recovery, is it time to furnish your financials with eth ethan allen. there are the interviews you can't afford to miss, all coming up on "mad money." >>> don't miss a minute of "mad money." follow jim on twitter. send jim...
698
698
Dec 29, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 698
favorite 0
quote 0
to apples comparison because of the greatest risk of losing your risk with stock as compared to the ten-year? >> let's get empirical, what stocks have outperformed for the last 20 or 30 years? that's reinvested dividend. i'm getting this from jeremy seagal's work. go read his book and you will know exactly why i think dividends are so important. a pullback can be the market giving back. i like stocks that have pulled back from the new high list between 5% and 8%. don't chase momentum, it's a starting point, not an ending point. >>> don't miss a second of "mad money." follow @jimcramer. send him an e-mail, or give us a call at 1-800-743-cnbc. miss something? head to madmoney.cnbc.com. >>> welcome back to tonight's methods to madness show. some of my best tricks for buying and selling stocks. truly, this is wisdom for the ages. think of me as penn and teller for the stock market. if that resonates at all for this group. pull back the curtain. how it looks for stocks to buy and stocks to sell, sell, sell. no magic, no hidden talent. disciplines that can make you "mad money" if you mast
to apples comparison because of the greatest risk of losing your risk with stock as compared to the ten-year? >> let's get empirical, what stocks have outperformed for the last 20 or 30 years? that's reinvested dividend. i'm getting this from jeremy seagal's work. go read his book and you will know exactly why i think dividends are so important. a pullback can be the market giving back. i like stocks that have pulled back from the new high list between 5% and 8%. don't chase momentum,...
131
131
Dec 26, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 131
favorite 0
quote 0
say apple issues a report that is better than not only the posted numbers that you find on web sites, but also beats what is known as the high man -- some call it the whisper, i think that's wrong. the high man. the analyst with the most aggressively high estimates on the street. that beat will cause a raising of numbers for the year by everyone. or if it is the end of the year, for the numbers in the year after it. i use that increase in earnings per share, the ones they use to bump it, to figure out several things. first, i try to figure out the increase from real business, actual sales did. they do better. and not just accounting change and share count changes. the latter fools a lot of people. to do what i like to do i look at the revenues than the earnings themselves. why is that important? because the company can't change the sales line except by increasing demand, producing more, gaining more customers, either at the expense of others or through better salesmanship, execution, and customer acquisition. they're making a better job, they're working harder. they're working it bett
say apple issues a report that is better than not only the posted numbers that you find on web sites, but also beats what is known as the high man -- some call it the whisper, i think that's wrong. the high man. the analyst with the most aggressively high estimates on the street. that beat will cause a raising of numbers for the year by everyone. or if it is the end of the year, for the numbers in the year after it. i use that increase in earnings per share, the ones they use to bump it, to...
64
64
Dec 29, 2012
12/12
by
WBAL
tv
eye 64
favorite 0
quote 0
to apples comparison because of the greatest risk of losing your risk with stock as compared to the ten-year? >> let's get empirical, what stocks have outperformed for the last 20 or 30 years? that's reinvested dividend. i'm getting this from jeremy seagal's work. go read his book and you will know exactly why i think dividends are so important. a pullback can be the market giving back. i like stocks that have pulled back from the new high list between 5% and 8%. don't chase momentum, it's a starting point, not an ending point. >>> don't miss a second of "mad money." follow @jimcramer. send him an e-mail, or give us a call at 1-800-743-cnbc. miss something? head to madmoney.cnbc.com. i played a round of golf.id in the last five hours? then i read a book while teaching myself how to play guitar; ran ten miles while knitting myself a sweater; jumped out of a plane. finally, i became a ping pong master while recording my debut album. how you ask? with 5-hour energy. i get hours of energy now -- no crash later. wait to see the next five hours. [ woman #2 ] it's the real deal! [ man #1 ]
to apples comparison because of the greatest risk of losing your risk with stock as compared to the ten-year? >> let's get empirical, what stocks have outperformed for the last 20 or 30 years? that's reinvested dividend. i'm getting this from jeremy seagal's work. go read his book and you will know exactly why i think dividends are so important. a pullback can be the market giving back. i like stocks that have pulled back from the new high list between 5% and 8%. don't chase momentum,...
186
186
Dec 18, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 186
favorite 0
quote 0
apple had a 28% correction, come all the way down from down there. it was still be low the other targets. in the end they said it was at a near term trough and seemed like a good trade to them. the supply constraints may not be an issue at all. more than just a trade. downgraded which caused the stock to trade more thank $500 before it opened. as articulated in our recent initiation, it was trading oriented. reflecting the near term rally. however, near term supply chain bring into question the strength of the iphone 5. as such, we see the likelihood of the near term rally as diminished and downgrade the shares to neutral. they don't like it december 16th at 5:09 the reason? too many iphones. hard to make this stuff up. the stock closed at $535. what really happened here? i think the team chose to be traders not analysts. that didn't happen here. the evidence that the i5 was selling well. this is very sobering people. as the stock ran from $525 to $571 and created a short-term buy right here. i think these pieces, i think they should be wake-up calls
apple had a 28% correction, come all the way down from down there. it was still be low the other targets. in the end they said it was at a near term trough and seemed like a good trade to them. the supply constraints may not be an issue at all. more than just a trade. downgraded which caused the stock to trade more thank $500 before it opened. as articulated in our recent initiation, it was trading oriented. reflecting the near term rally. however, near term supply chain bring into question the...
228
228
Dec 14, 2012
12/12
by
CNBC
tv
eye 228
favorite 0
quote 0
could that be apple getting back to where it was? the bottom line, charts aren't more powerful than the fiscal cliff, but while we wait for washington to finish its game of deal or no deal, this market has some hurdle jumping to do. if the s & p can break out above 1446, today's pullback can be overcome and the entire market could levitate. that's what we need to see to get the charts on our side, or brodin's version of them. i'm with her. cautious, wary, but opportunistic, all the same. after the break, i'll try to make you more money. >> coming up, last minute shopping? after almost doubling this year, shares of the gap have gapped down. could this mega name clothing retailer now be gift wrapped just for you, or will cliff worries about locking in gains for the year soon make it come apart at the seams? cramer is trying it on, just ahead. >>> and, later, engine of growth? the power outages that followed superstorm sandy gave many homeowners a wakeup call. as the rebuild continues, could an investment in engine company briggs & stra
could that be apple getting back to where it was? the bottom line, charts aren't more powerful than the fiscal cliff, but while we wait for washington to finish its game of deal or no deal, this market has some hurdle jumping to do. if the s & p can break out above 1446, today's pullback can be overcome and the entire market could levitate. that's what we need to see to get the charts on our side, or brodin's version of them. i'm with her. cautious, wary, but opportunistic, all the same....